Case 4101462/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Grygiel v Damian Gasiorowski (Deceased) — 2021
- Case reference
- 4101462/2020
- Decision date
- 21 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Grygiel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for the respondent as a shop assistant from 2 March 2018 until 1 December 2019. The respondent died on 28 May 2020 and no ET3 response was lodged, so the case proceeded on the basis of the claimant's essentially unchallenged evidence. The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim could not succeed because the claimant did not have sufficient qualifying service, and it noted that she had worked her two weeks' notice.
On pay, the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that the agreed rate was £9 per hour net, with the respondent responsible for tax and national insurance. On that basis it found an unlawful deduction from wages because no PAYE or national insurance had been accounted to HMRC during the employment. Using an average net wage of £325 per week over 92 weeks, the tribunal ordered £4,784.00 to HMRC and £1,407.60 to the claimant for the cost of voluntary Class 3 contributions. It also upheld the holiday pay claim, applying the statutory holiday year from 2 March to 1 March, calculating accrued leave to 1 December 2019, and deducting the £360 already paid for the claimant's month off in June 2019.
The tribunal found that most of the claimant's sex discrimination complaints were not made out and amounted to generalised criticism or bullying rather than treatment because of sex. It did, however, uphold one incident in October 2019 when the respondent offered to give the claimant a cuddle after she had started crying. The tribunal found that this incident was unwanted, related to sex, and amounted to direct discrimination, but it did not find that it caused the claimant to leave her employment. Compensation was assessed solely by reference to injury to feelings, and the tribunal awarded £1,000 at the lower end of the Vento scale.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted that the parties agreed a net rate of £9 per hour, with the respondent responsible for tax and national insurance. It ordered £4,784.00 to HMRC for unpaid tax/NIC and £1,407.60 to the claimant for the cost of voluntary Class 3 contributions. | Upheld | — | £6,192 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal applied the statutory holiday year, calculated accrued holiday pay to 1 December 2019, and deducted the £360 already paid for the June 2019 month off. | Upheld | — | £1,012 |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal rejected the wider complaints as generalised criticism and bullying not linked to sex, but upheld the October 2019 incident where the respondent offered a cuddle to the crying claimant. It awarded £1,000 for injury to feelings at the lower end of the Vento scale. | Upheld | Sex | £1,000 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant did not have sufficient qualifying service to bring an unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,203
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,408
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Equality Act
- s.26 Equality Act
- Vento scale
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.