Case 4101468/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101468/2019 Miss A Gallagher v Colin’s Tyres — 2019
- Case reference
- 4101468/2019
- Decision date
- 5 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davis Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101468/2019 Miss A Gallagher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge Davis Hoey issued a judgment on the available material under rule 21. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay three gross sums: £360 for 1 week's lying time calculated at 40 hours at £9 per hour, £513 for unpaid wages, and £328.85 for sums deducted by way of tax but not remitted to HMRC. The listed hearing on 17 April 2019 was cancelled.
The judgment does not identify any other claims or legal tests, and it does not apportion the award between separate causes of action. The total amount ordered is £1,201.85 gross.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented. The tribunal ordered payment of three gross sums: £360 for 1 week's lying time at 40 hours x £9 per hour, £513 unpaid wages, and £328.85 deducted by way of tax but not remitted to HMRC. | Upheld | — | £1,202 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,202
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.