Case 4101469/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Stephen Anderson v Allander Bibco Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101469/2022
- Decision date
- 26 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Stephen Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing in Glasgow on 25 July 2022, before Employment Judge R McPherson, the tribunal held that Mr Stephen Anderson’s claim of constructive unfair dismissal succeeded. The respondent, Allander Bibco Ltd, did not appear and was not represented.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a monetary award for unfair dismissal in the total sum of £96,565.00. That award was divided into a basic award of £7,072.00 and a compensatory award of £89,493.00, subject to the compensatory cap.
The judgment records that there was no prescribed element in the award, so the full sum was payable immediately to the claimant. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, and no written reasons were requested at that time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant’s claim of constructive unfair dismissal succeeded and awards the monetary award for Unfair Dismissal in the total sum of £96,565.00, made up of a basic award of £7,072.00 and a compensatory award of £89,493.00. | Upheld | — | £96,565 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £96,565
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £7,072
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £89,493
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.