Case 4101483/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Mary Bardin v Morar Care Group IRL Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 4101483/2025
- Decision date
- 11 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Shepherd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Mary Bardin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case in Glasgow by CVP on 4 March 2026 before Employment Judge J Shepherd. In its oral reasons, the tribunal dealt only with the claimant’s breach of contract claim against Morar Care Group IRL Ltd.
The tribunal found that the claim was not presented within the time limits in Article 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994. It also found that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time.
On that basis, the tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the breach of contract claim and dismissed it. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the breach of contract claim was not presented within the time limit in Article 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994, that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time, and therefore it had no jurisdiction to consider the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Article 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.