Case 4101508/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Smith v 15 Elinor Wade and Kenneth Wade — 2019
- Case reference
- 4101508/2019
- Decision date
- 17 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Glasgow on 10 and 11 June 2019 before Employment Judge M Whitcombe, the tribunal determined a preliminary issue and found that Ms H Smith was directly dismissed by the respondents at a meeting on 18 October 2018. The judgment does not contain a final merits determination on any substantive claim or any remedy assessment.
The tribunal recorded that the parties had reached agreed terms of settlement. On that basis, the hearing was adjourned and the claims were sisted until 9 July 2019 to allow the parties to carry out those terms of settlement. The tribunal asked the parties to notify it promptly and jointly if and when the proceedings could be dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dealt only with a preliminary issue and found that Ms H Smith was directly dismissed by the respondents at a meeting on 18 October 2018. It did not finally determine the merits of the underlying claims because the parties had reached agreed terms of settlement and the hearing was adjourned and the claims sisted to allow those terms to be carried out. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.