Case 4101538/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101538/2022 Mrs C I A Grigore-Neniu v PATRICK & YOUNG Limited (trading as LASH & LUSH) — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101538/2022
- Decision date
- 25 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Muriel Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101538/2022 Mrs C I A Grigore-Neniu
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment, made because no response had been presented to the claim. On the material available, Employment Judge Muriel Robison determined that Patrick & Young Limited, trading as Lash & Lush, had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £669.47. The judgment also records that the hearing listed for 27 May 2022 was cancelled.
No other substantive findings, legal tests, or additional remedies are set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £669.47. | Upheld | — | £669 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £669
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.