Case 4101542/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Sally Phyliss Coulthard v General for Scotland — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101542/2022
- Decision date
- 17 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Sally Phyliss Coulthard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 7 May 2022, Employment Judge Ian McPherson recorded that the claimant had withdrawn her complaint of discrimination on the grounds of sex, including equal pay, by the PH Agenda submitted on 16 May 2022 for use at the hearing. The respondent's representative made an unopposed oral application, and the Tribunal dismissed that part of the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment states that the remaining complaints, namely less favourable treatment because of part-time worker status in respect of pension entitlement under the Part Time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000, and alleged unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, were unaffected by the withdrawal. Those heads of complaint were to proceed separately under written note and orders issued under separate cover.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The claimant's complaint of discrimination on the grounds of sex, including equal pay, was withdrawn in writing by her representative in the PH Agenda submitted for the preliminary hearing. On the respondent's unopposed oral application, the Tribunal dismissed that part of the claim under Rule 52. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.