Case 4101544/2017 · Employment Tribunal
L Doherty Mr J O’ Donovan v Represented by: M s L O’Neill - Solicitor City of Glasgow College — 2017
- Case reference
- 4101544/2017
- Decision date
- 18 December 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
L Doherty Mr J O’ Donovan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered a complaint under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 brought by Mr J O'Donovan, a Senior Lecturer at City of Glasgow College. The dispute was selected to proceed as a test case from a wider group of linked complaints, and the only material issue was whether clause 3 of the national collective agreement gave the claimant a contractual entitlement to the £100 payment said to be due in respect of the 2015/16 pay settlement.
The tribunal found that the agreement, read as a whole, linked clause 3 to clause 2's interim payment of 1%/£300 and to clause 1's two-year settlement period covering 2015/16. It held that the natural and ordinary meaning of the wording meant that the additional £100 was part of the 2015/16 settlement, and that the respondents' technical implementation notes could not override the contractual wording. The tribunal also treated the timing of the March 2016 negotiations and the background of the pay dispute as supporting that interpretation.
On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the £100 was contractually payable and that, because pay was treated as consolidated unless stated otherwise, the sum should have been reflected in the claimant's contractual pay. It therefore held that the respondents had failed to pay the amount properly due and upheld the unlawful deductions claim, ordering the respondents to pay the claimant £100.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £100 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £100
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- objective contractual interpretation
- Arnold v Britton
- Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd
- Rainy Sky v Kookmin Bank
- s.13 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.