Case 4101568/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Crossan v Represented by Mr S Muir - Union Representative CAT Property Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101568/2022
- Decision date
- 11 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Crossan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss P Crossan began work at the New Cumnock store in 1986 and the tribunal accepted that her contractual terms from the Co-op, confirmed in 2012, included sick pay based on a sliding scale. Those terms were carried forward when the business was transferred first to McColl's and then to CAT 1 Property Limited, and the tribunal found that the respondent inherited the Co-op contract under TUPE rather than the later McColl's terms. The claimant did not sign or accept the respondent's proposed 2021 contract, so the tribunal held that the attempted change to her contractual terms had not taken effect.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to contractual sick pay while absent on sick leave from September 2021. It accepted the calculation advanced on her behalf that 30 weeks' sick pay at £185.34 per week came to £5,560.20 net, from which £1,754 previously paid as statutory sick pay was deducted, leaving £3,806.20. The tribunal then accepted that the respondent had failed altogether to deal with the grievance raised about the contract and sick pay issue, and that this was an unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures.
The tribunal therefore applied a 25% uplift under s.207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, adding £951.55 and producing a total award of £4,757.75. The separate holiday pay claim was treated as withdrawn because the claimant's employment had not ended and she was not yet entitled to payment in lieu of untaken leave.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant succeeded on her claim for unpaid wages in respect of contractual sick pay. The tribunal held that her 2012 Co-op terms, including the contractual sick pay provision, had transferred on to later employers under TUPE and had not been validly changed by the respondent's unsigned 2021 contract. The award comprised £3,806.20 for unpaid contractual sick pay plus a 25% uplift of £951.55 under s.207A TULRCA 1992 for the respondent's unreasonable failure to deal with the grievance in accordance with the ACAS Code of Practice. | Upheld | — | £4,758 |
| Holiday pay | Withdrawn because the claimant's employment had not yet terminated, so she was not entitled at that stage to payment in lieu of untaken leave under regulations 14 and 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,758
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 4 TUPE 2006
- section 207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures
- regulations 14 and 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.