Case 4101569/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Don v No appearance and No representation S&J Combe Transport Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101569/2022
- Decision date
- 19 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Don
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningHeld via Cloud Video Platform in Glasgow on 17 August 2022 before Employment Judge P Smith, the Claimant, Mr I Don, did not attend and was not represented. S&J Combe Transport Limited attended through its director, Mr S Combe.
The Tribunal recorded that the Claimant's non-attendance was without explanation. On the Respondent's application, the Tribunal dismissed the Claimant's claims under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013. The judgment contains no findings on the substantive merits of the claims and no monetary award; reasons were given orally, with written reasons only if requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under rule 47 following the Claimant's non-attendance without explanation; the judgment contains no separate merits findings on this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under rule 47 following the Claimant's non-attendance without explanation; the judgment contains no separate merits findings on this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed under rule 47 following the Claimant's non-attendance without explanation; the judgment contains no separate merits findings on this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.