Case 4101586/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 4101586/2015 Ms A McRobert v West Dunbartonshire Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 4101586/2015
- Decision date
- 4 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 4101586/2015 Ms A McRobert
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued under rule 38(1)(d).
The judgment records that the claimant's solicitors had withdrawn, that a strike out warning letter was sent after the claimant failed to respond to a status enquiry, and that correspondence was returned because the claimant no longer lived at the address on the ET1. The claimant had not provided a new address, so the Tribunal could not communicate with her and assumed she no longer wished to pursue the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim type is indicated by the gov.uk listing category, but the judgment itself only refers to 'the claim' and does not set out the underlying cause of action. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Claim type is indicated by the gov.uk listing category, but the judgment itself only refers to 'the claim' and does not set out the underlying cause of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.