Case 4101590/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101590/2022 E Zacesta v Secure Transport Solutions Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101590/2022
- Decision date
- 15 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101590/2022 E Zacesta
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge Robert Gall decided the case without a hearing and cancelled the listed hearing on 23 June 2022.
The tribunal upheld three monetary claims. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £838.46, described as one week's gross pay. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,676.92, described as two weeks' gross pay.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £787.74 for 74.88 hours of holiday pay. The combined amount awarded was £3,303.12.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £838.46, described as 1 week's gross pay. | Upheld | — | £838 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,676.92, described as 2 weeks' gross pay. | Upheld | — | £1,677 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £787.74 for 74.88 hours of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £788 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,303
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.