Case 4101591/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101591/2022 Mr A Zacesta v Secure Transport Solutions Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101591/2022
- Decision date
- 15 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101591/2022 Mr A Zacesta
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge Robert Gall issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The hearing listed for 23 June 2022 was cancelled. The tribunal made three monetary awards in the claimant's favour.
It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £838.46 gross, described as one week's pay. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,676.92 gross as damages for two weeks' pay. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and awarded £787.74 for 74.88 hours of holiday pay.
The judgment does not record any separate basic award, compensatory award, injury to feelings award, or interest. The total sum awarded on the face of the judgment is £3,303.12.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages. Amount ordered was stated as £838.46 gross (1 week's pay). | Upheld | — | £838 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered £1,676.92 gross damages (2 weeks' pay). | Upheld | — | £1,677 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £787.74 for 74.88 hours of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £788 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,303
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.