Case 4101597/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Kevin William Haughton v The Hemp Room Cafe — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101597/2022
- Decision date
- 1 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge McFatridge
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Kevin William Haughton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Kevin William Haughton brought a single claim for holiday pay following the termination of his employment on 31 December 2021. The respondent denied the claim and did not attend the hearing, having written to the tribunal that it had ceased trading on 13 August 2022 and was in the process of becoming insolvent. The Employment Judge heard evidence from the claimant and accepted the documents lodged in the bundle.
The tribunal found that the claimant had started work on or about 1 March 2020 on a zero-hours contract but that, despite being furloughed from late March 2020 to 30 September 2021, he continued to do work for the respondent. It accepted his evidence that he continued to carry out administrative tasks and online order processing, and that for the period up to 30 September 2021 he was in fact working 34.25 hours per week. The tribunal also accepted that in October 2021 he stopped making deliveries because of worsening mobility issues, but continued with administrative work thereafter.
On holiday entitlement, the tribunal accepted that the holiday year ran from 1 January to 31 December and that the claimant took no actual holiday during 2021, although he was paid for some holiday in December. It rejected the claimant's initial calculation as a direct contractual sum and instead carried out its own calculation, noting that the claim was not being made under the Working Time Regulations. Using the agreed hourly rate of £12 and the hours worked across the year, it calculated a weekly average pay of £326.48 and a holiday entitlement of 5.6 weeks, giving £1,828.29 for the year.
From that figure the tribunal deducted £332.25 already paid in respect of holiday pay, leaving £1,496.04 due. Judgment was therefore entered for the claimant in that sum in respect of annual leave accrued but untaken.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay on termination. The tribunal noted the claimant was not making a claim under the Working Time Regulations and instead relied on the contract, but it calculated the entitlement by reference to average pay over the 52 weeks before termination. | Upheld | — | £1,496 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,496
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- sections 221-224 ERA 1996
- Regulation 16(3)(e)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.