Case 4101655/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Jen Nelson v 15 Renfrewshire Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101655/2023
- Decision date
- 24 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Jen Nelson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Jen Nelson resigned with immediate effect on 7 November 2022 after a grievance process about events that began on 7 October 2021. The tribunal found that the Head Teacher’s conduct on 7 October 2021 was aggressive and intimidating, and that the stage 1 grievance decision was poor quality, with inadequate reasoning and a procedurally irregular approach to evidence. It also found that Susan Bell was biased against the claimant at stage 1, and that stage 2 did not properly cure those defects.
Despite those findings, the tribunal held that the respondent’s conduct had not caused serious damage to the relationship of trust and confidence by the date of resignation. The decisive factor was that stage 3 of the grievance procedure remained available and was found to be a viable, independent appeal to elected council members, with a realistic prospect of providing a fair hearing and correcting the earlier failings. In that context, the tribunal concluded that the relationship had been damaged but not destroyed or seriously damaged to the level required for a repudiatory breach.
The tribunal rejected the claimant’s submission that John Trainer was biased or that he was required to stop the stage 2 process and restart the grievance from the beginning. It found that he had overseen a flawed process, but not a biased one. Because there was no breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, the claimant’s resignation was not in response to a fundamental breach of contract and therefore did not amount to a dismissal for the purposes of section 95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The unfair dismissal claim accordingly failed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was presented as unfair constructive dismissal. The tribunal found there was no breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, so the claimant was not dismissed within section 95(1)(c) ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- Courtaulds Northern Textiles Ltd v Andrew
- Malik v BCCI
- Wright v North Ayrshire Council
- Leeds Dental Team Ltd v Rose
- Bournemouth University Higher Education Corporation v Buckland
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.