Case 4101666/2017 · Employment Tribunal
N M Hosie (sitting alone)10 Mr P Khatri-Chhetri v Gurkha Kitchen — 2017
- Case reference
- 4101666/2017
- Decision date
- 23 August 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
N M Hosie (sitting alone)10 Mr P Khatri-Chhetri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Edinburgh on 16 August 2017, the tribunal recorded complaints of unlawful deduction of wages, outstanding holiday and sick pay, and notice pay. No ET3 had been lodged. The tribunal also noted that the respondent employer was Gurkha Kitchen Restaurant Limited, trading as Gurkha Kitchen.
The claimant had started work on 15 June 2015 as restaurant manager. After about three months the restaurant closed because of water damage to the premises. The claimant assisted with an insurance claim for loss of income, but that claim was unsuccessful. By the time repairs were complete and the premises were ready to reopen around January 2017, the company had no funds and had not traded since September 2015.
The tribunal found that the water damage occurred through neither party's fault and that it made the employment contract impossible to perform. It held that the contract was frustrated and ended automatically by operation of law, so the claimant was not entitled to the sums he sought under the contract. The claimant also said the respondent company had ceased trading and had no assets, and he told the tribunal that he wished to withdraw his claim and was agreeable to dismissal. The judgment accordingly dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Covers the outstanding holiday and sick pay elements described in the reasons. The tribunal found the contract had been frustrated after the restaurant closed because of water damage and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay element. Dismissed on the same basis; the claimant later said he wished to withdraw and agreed to dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.