Case 4101672/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101672/2022 Mr M Gill v The Electric Cycle Company (Edinburgh) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101672/2022
- Decision date
- 13 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101672/2022 Mr M Gill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge Laura Doherty issued a rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal held that the respondent had failed to pay Mr M Gill a redundancy payment, had dismissed him in breach of contract in respect of notice, and had failed to pay holiday entitlement.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,019.07 for redundancy pay, £679.40 in damages for notice pay, and £779.28 for 12 days' holiday entitlement. The hearing listed for 8 June 2022 was cancelled. The judgment was dated 11 May 2022 and entered in the register on 13 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Award stated to relate to 12 days' holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £779 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,019 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £679 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,478
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.