Case 4101677/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Strang v Clarke EPOS (UK) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101677/2022
- Decision date
- 17 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murphy
- Venue
- the Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Strang
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims for unpaid salary and car allowance, unpaid pension contributions, untaken annual leave, and four weeks' notice pay. In its ET3, the respondent accepted that salary, car allowance and pension contributions referable to 1 December 2021 to 2 February 2022 had not been paid, and also accepted that 4.67 days' annual leave accrued in 2022 was due but unpaid. The case had been postponed several times, including a December 2022 hearing date to allow an agreed settlement to be implemented.
The respondent did not attend the final hearing on 13 April 2023. The tribunal proceeded in its absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013. It did not issue a judgment by consent on the figures proposed by the respondent because those sums were net and there was no clarity about the intended tax treatment. The tribunal therefore heard evidence from the claimant on the remaining live claims.
The tribunal upheld the two admitted unauthorised deduction claims and ordered the respondent to pay £6,939.48 for unpaid wages earned between 1 December 2021 and 2 February 2022 and £714.88 in respect of 4.67 days' untaken annual leave accrued in 2022. The tribunal recorded that those sums were expressed gross of tax and national insurance, with any lawful deductions to be accounted for by the respondent to HMRC.
During the hearing the claimant withdrew the remaining claims. The notice pay claim, the claim for 7 days' carried-over annual leave from 2021, and the claim for employer pension contributions for December 2021 and January and February 2022 were dismissed pursuant to Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 because they had been withdrawn.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages, including salary and car allowance, for the period 1 December 2021 to 2 February 2022. | Upheld | — | £6,939 |
| Holiday pay | 4.67 days' untaken annual leave accrued in 2022 prior to termination. | Upheld | — | £715 |
| Breach of contract | Four weeks' notice pay claim; withdrawn by the claimant during the hearing and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for 7 days' accrued untaken annual leave carried forward from 2021; withdrawn by the claimant during the hearing and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim for employer pension contributions for December 2021 and January and February 2022; withdrawn by the claimant during the hearing and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,654
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.