Case 4101680/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101680/2022 Held in Glasgow on and September 2022 Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn Mrs Helen McKenna v No appearance and No representation Drivercheck Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101680/2022
- Decision date
- 26 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge McManus. The
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101680/2022 Held in Glasgow on and September 2022 Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn Mrs Helen McKenna
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was listed for a final hearing on 14 to 20 September 2022 on the claimant's allegation of constructive unfair dismissal. The claimant did not attend on 14 September or 15 September 2022. The tribunal noted that the claimant's ET1 had said she was unfairly dismissed, and her resignation letter referred to an irretrievable breakdown of trust/victimisation and to a threat, but the judgment was ultimately concerned with her failure to attend rather than the underlying resignation complaint.
The tribunal recorded that hearing dates and other documents had been sent to the claimant by email at the address given in the claim form. It also recorded the claimant's conflicting explanations about her availability: on 16 June 2022 she said she was free whenever, on 13 September 2022 she said she was unavailable because she was on holiday, and on 14 September 2022 she told the tribunal clerk she was at work and would not attend on 15 or 16 September. The tribunal had already refused a late postponement application and directed the claimant to attend in person on 15 September 2022.
On 15 September 2022 the tribunal considered Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the overriding objective, and the information obtained by the clerks about the claimant's absence. It concluded that it would not be appropriate to proceed in the claimant's absence because the claim could not succeed without her evidence, and that a further adjournment would cause delay and expense. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 47. It also noted that emails sent to the claimant at the address in the claim form were taken to have been received under Rule 90 unless the contrary was proved.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the hearing on 15 September 2022. The tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of the constructive dismissal complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.95 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 47 (Non-attendance)
- Rule 2 (Overriding Objective)
- Rule 90 (Date of delivery)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.