Case 4101700/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Wales v No appearance Greyside Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101700/2022
- Decision date
- 7 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sutherland Date
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Wales
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAngela Wales presented complaints of unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, notice pay and holiday pay against Greyside Ltd. No response was lodged by the respondent. The tribunal asked the claimant to provide compensation details and later evidence of earnings and mitigation, but she did not provide the requested evidence or reply.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Presented by the claimant but dismissed in its entirety under Rule 47 because she did not attend or be represented at the final hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Presented by the claimant but dismissed in its entirety under Rule 47 because she did not attend or be represented at the final hearing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim included a complaint for notice pay; the tribunal dismissed the claim in its entirety under Rule 47 without determining the merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim included a complaint for holiday pay; the tribunal dismissed the claim in its entirety under Rule 47 without determining the merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 ET Rules
- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.