Case 4101705/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v N Duddy T/a Strathaven Tea Room — 2019
- Case reference
- 4101705/2019
- Decision date
- 26 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Mackay presented an unfair dismissal claim on 6 February 2019. Her employment ended on 28 September 2018. The tribunal found that, taking account of the early conciliation process, the claim had to be presented on or before 27 January 2019, so the claim was late by about ten days.
The claimant said she had understood from online research that she had three months from receipt of the early conciliation certificate, and she also said she had been dealing with family issues following her brother’s suicide. The tribunal accepted that she had made some online enquiries and that the family circumstances were difficult, but it found that she knew she had a right to bring a claim and had started early conciliation shortly after her employment ended.
Applying section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the authorities cited, including Palmer and Saunders v Southend on Sea Borough Council, Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser, and Trevelyans (Birmingham) Ltd v Norton, the tribunal held that the claimant’s misunderstanding of the time limit did not make it not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time. It also found there was no evidence that her emotional circumstances prevented her from doing so. The tribunal therefore held the claim was out of time and could not proceed. Separately, it recorded an earlier preparation time order requiring the respondent to pay the claimant £102 and gave 14 days for payment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the claim was presented out of time under section 111 ERA 1996 and could not proceed because it was reasonably practicable to present it within time. A separate preparation time order for £102 had been made at an earlier hearing and was noted in the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £102
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- early conciliation time extension
- reasonably practicable test
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend on Sea Borough Council
- Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser
- Trevelyans (Birmingham) Ltd v Norton
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.