Case 4101707/2019 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101707/20195 Held at Dundee on May 2019 Employment Judge: W A Meiklejohn Mrs Marion Smith v Mr Amit Patni — 2019
- Case reference
- 4101707/2019
- Decision date
- 16 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alexander Meiklejohn
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101707/20195 Held at Dundee on May 2019 Employment Judge: W A Meiklejohn Mrs Marion Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs Marion Smith, brought claims for unlawful deduction of wages and holiday pay against Mr Amit Patni. The respondent did not submit an ET3 and did not appear or be represented at the final hearing in Dundee on 10 May 2019. The tribunal first considered time bar and held that both claims were brought outwith the ordinary three-month period, but that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present them in time and that she had presented them within a reasonable period after expiry.
On the evidence accepted as credible, the claimant resigned on 18 August 2018 and was normally paid two weeks in arrears. The tribunal found that when she left employment she was entitled to two weeks' pay, but the respondent did not make payment. That produced an award of £660 gross, which netted to £570.06 after deductions for tax and national insurance.
On holiday pay, the tribunal accepted that the relevant holiday year ran from 1 April to 31 March. It found that the claimant had accrued a pro rata entitlement of 11 days by 18 August 2018, had taken 6 days, and therefore had 5 days remaining. Although the respondent had told her that her entitlement was two weeks' holiday pay, the tribunal held that this was incorrect. The award was £330 gross, netting to £285.03. The tribunal ordered payment of the net sums, and noted that the respondent was responsible for accounting to HM Revenue & Customs for the relevant tax and national insurance deductions.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the claim was not time-barred, found the claimant was entitled to two weeks' wages on leaving employment on 18 August 2018, and awarded the net sum of £570.06. | Upheld | — | £570 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal held the holiday pay claim was not time-barred, found the claimant had accrued but untaken holiday of 5 days as at 18 August 2018, and awarded the net sum of £285.03. | Upheld | — | £285 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £855
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 23(2) and (4) ERA 1996
- paragraph 30(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- not reasonably practicable
- regulations 14(3)(b) and 15A(3) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.