Case 4101709/2013 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs AJ Walker v Stewart Walker & Sons Limited (in liquidation) — 2018
- Case reference
- 4101709/2013
- Decision date
- 19 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs AJ Walker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a procedural hearing on 17 December 2018 before Employment Judge Robert Gall in Glasgow. The claimant appeared in person. There was no appearance by or representation for the respondent, Stewart Walker & Sons Limited (in liquidation), and the tribunal recorded that the company had in fact been dissolved on 22 November 2017.
The tribunal explained to the claimant that, where a respondent company has been dissolved, it is not able to make any award because the company no longer exists. The judge noted that restoration of the company to the register might be possible and that this was a matter for the claimant to consider. The hearing was therefore postponed and the claim sisted until 31 January 2019 so that the claimant could decide whether to take any further steps and inform the tribunal of her intentions. The tribunal also noted that if the respondent remained dissolved, the claim could not proceed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal did not adjudicate the substantive claims. The hearing was postponed and the case sisted until 31 January 2019 because the respondent company had been dissolved on 22 November 2017. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.