Case 4101743/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Lennie v Healthcare Washroom Services Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4101743/2019
- Decision date
- 8 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Lennie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr B Lennie presented his claim on 7 February 2019 seeking two weeks' notice pay on termination of his employment. The claim form stated that his monthly salary was £1,482, and the tribunal used that figure to calculate a weekly rate of £342.
The respondent did not lodge a response by the deadline and did not seek an extension. The tribunal wrote to the claimant for further information, but he confirmed that no further information could be provided. On the available material, the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made of the breach of contract claim for notice pay.
The tribunal found that the claimant had not received two weeks' notice pay and entered judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. It held that the respondent failed to pay notice pay on termination and ordered payment of £684, being two weeks at £342 per week.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Default judgment under Rule 21. The tribunal treated the unpaid notice pay claim as a breach of contract claim and awarded two weeks' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £684 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £684
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.