Case 4101754/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Dilan Flanagan v SBC Empire Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101754/2023
- Decision date
- 18 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
- Venue
- Glasgow remotely
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Dilan Flanagan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe final hearing took place remotely on 3 July 2023. The respondent did not appear or defend the claim. The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence as honest and reliable, found that he had worked as a kitchen chef from 27 December 2021 at £10.50 per hour, usually around 35 hours per week, and recorded an average net weekly wage of £227.89. It also recorded that he was summarily dismissed on or around 30 December 2022 without notice, and observed that there appeared to be no proper basis for the summary dismissal, although the unfair dismissal issue ultimately turned on jurisdiction.
On the wages claim, the tribunal accepted that £250 had been retained from the claimant's wages as a 'lie payment' and had not been repaid. It also accepted that the holiday year ran with the calendar year, that the claimant had taken and been paid for three days' leave in 2022, and that 25 days remained due at termination. Using a net daily rate of £45.58, the tribunal calculated holiday pay due at £1,139.50, then deducted the £300 paid on 21 December 2022, leaving £839.50 outstanding. That sum was treated as an unlawful deduction from wages.
On notice pay, the tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to one week's notice under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and that his net weekly wage of £227.89 was the proper measure of damages for the respondent's breach of contract in failing to give notice. It noted that he secured a new role on 10 January 2023. The total award was £1,317.39 net of tax. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it, the claimant not having two years' continuous service under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Included the retained £250 described as a 'lie payment' and £839.50 of unpaid holiday pay calculated under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 after crediting £300 already paid on 21 December 2022. | Upheld | — | £1,090 |
| Breach of contract | One week's notice pay, measured by the claimant's average net weekly wage. The tribunal relied on section 86 ERA 1996 and noted that the claimant obtained new work on 10 January 2023. | Upheld | — | £228 |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the tribunal had no jurisdiction: the claimant had less than two years' continuous service for an unfair dismissal claim under section 108 ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,317
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- ss.212-214 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.