Case 4101770/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101770/2023 Miss M Bunce v Listhomer Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101770/2023
- Decision date
- 4 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101770/2023 Miss M Bunce
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment on the available material because no response had been presented and the respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. The Employment Judge, S MacLean, issued judgment on 3 May 2023 and entered it on 4 May 2023. The hearing listed for 15 June 2023 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that Miss M Bunce had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,427.13. The judgment records that this figure represented 19.5 weeks' pay at a weekly rate of £175.75.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £175.75 gross. No other claims, legal tests, or panel members were recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,427.13, calculated as 19.5 weeks' pay at £175.75 per week. | Upheld | — | £3,427 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £175.75 gross. | Upheld | — | £176 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,603
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.