Case 4101802/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4101802/2019 Mr S McMahon v Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101802/2019
- Decision date
- 28 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4101802/2019 Mr S McMahon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claim had been sisted since 25 March 2019 pending settlement. It later wrote to the claimant on 11 February 2022 asking whether he intended to withdraw the claim, and issued a reminder on 3 March 2022, but no replies were received.
On 7 April 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 22 April 2022, or to request a hearing, to address why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing. The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment describes the claim only as a claim that had been sisted pending settlement and was struck out for not being actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). The underlying cause of action is not identified in the extracted judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.