Case 4101827/2020 · Employment Tribunal
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101827/2020 (V) Hearing by CVP at Edinburgh on and November 2020 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Gordon McBrearty v Marks and Spencer plc — 2020
- Case reference
- 4101827/2020
- Decision date
- 16 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo Macleod
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101827/2020 (V) Hearing by CVP at Edinburgh on and November 2020 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Gordon McBrearty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the claimant's unfair dismissal claim against Marks & Spencer plc by CVP at Edinburgh on 9 and 10 November 2020. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr J Anderson, barrister.
The written judgment records that the claimant's claim for unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. It states that oral reasons were given at the hearing, but the written text does not provide further factual findings or reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for unfair dismissal fails and is dismissed. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, but the written judgment does not set out the substantive reasoning. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.