Case 4101842/2012 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 100727/2011 & Others (see attached list) Mrs M Little & others v Represented by: Thompsons North Ayrshire Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4101842/2012
- Decision date
- 17 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 100727/2011 & Others (see attached list) Mrs M Little & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a multiple-schedule employment tribunal judgment dated 17 August 2019 before Employment Judge Frances Eccles. Case 4101842/2012 appears in the attached list as Miss Angela Devlin v North Ayrshire Council, with the claimant represented by Thompsons and the respondent by MacRoberts LLP.
The judgment records no merits findings. It states that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants.
Because the claims were withdrawn, the tribunal dismissed them under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No remedy, award, or other substantive relief was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment states that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52. Case 4101842/2012 is listed in the multiple schedule as Miss Angela Devlin v North Ayrshire Council. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.