Case 4101849/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4101849/2023, 4101889/2023, 4101927/2023, 4101930/2023, 4101931/2023 4102193/2023, 4102914/2023 M r C J o n e s Ms S Clark M r T Miles M r A Yevhen Ms O Shpeko Ms M MacKenzie v Rule judgment template (simple) Mr R Scott Artydough Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101849/2023
- Decision date
- 15 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4101849/2023, 4101889/2023, 4101927/2023, 4101930/2023, 4101931/2023 4102193/2023, 4102914/2023 M r C J o n e s Ms S Clark M r T Miles M r A Yevhen Ms O Shpeko Ms M MacKenzie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in a multi-claim case brought by Mr C Jones, Ms S Clark, Mr T Miles, Mr A Yevhen, Ms O Shpeko, Ms M MacKenzie and Mr R Scott against Artydough Ltd. No response had been presented, so the Employment Judge decided the case on the available material under rule 21. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of unpaid wages and accrued holiday, and had failed to provide statements of terms and conditions as required by section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment set out itemised awards for each claimant. For unpaid wages, the awards were £780.72 to Mr Jones, £722 to Ms Clark, £715.90 to Mr Miles, £294.50 to Mr Yevhen, £287.38 to Ms Shpeko and £101.50 to Ms MacKenzie. For holiday pay, the awards were £855, £699.75, £1,153, £665, £665, £102.90 and £161.70 respectively. Separate awards of two weeks' pay were also made for the failure to provide written statements: £418, £361, £558, £665, £703, £266 and £147.
The respondent was permitted to deduct any income tax and employee National Insurance Contributions required by law before payment, provided the sums deducted were remitted to HMRC and the claimants were given written evidence. On the face of the judgment, the aggregate awards totalled £10,322.35 before any required deductions for tax or National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 default judgment. Awards for unpaid wages were made to six claimants: Mr Jones, Ms Clark, Mr Miles, Mr Yevhen, Ms Shpeko and Ms MacKenzie; Mr Scott had no unpaid-wages award. | Upheld | — | £2,902 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 default judgment. Awards for unpaid holiday pay were made to all seven claimants named in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,302 |
| Other | Rule 21 default judgment. The tribunal awarded two weeks' pay for failure to provide statements of terms and conditions required by section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £3,118 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,322
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.