Case 4101851/2013 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 101138/2008 & others (per attached schedule) Ms M Gracie & others v Represented by: Addleshaw Goddard LLP North Lanarkshire Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4101851/2013
- Decision date
- 10 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 101138/2008 & others (per attached schedule) Ms M Gracie & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is an administrative disposal rather than a merits decision. It states that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The case appears in the schedule of North Lanarkshire Council equal pay matters, including the 'EQP 2nd wave' list, but the judgment does not set out any findings on liability, comparators, remedy, or compensation. No substantive legal analysis is recorded in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment records that the claims were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52. This case is listed in the EQP 2nd wave schedule for North Lanarkshire Council, but the judgment does not contain any substantive merits findings. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.