Case 4101853/2020 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101853/2020 (P) Mr P MacFarlane v Dundee East Inns Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4101853/2020
- Decision date
- 2 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101853/2020 (P) Mr P MacFarlane
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim. The judgment records that an earlier Rule 21 decision dated 26 May 2020 had dealt with certain of the claimant's claims, and that in relation to unfair dismissal the claim had succeeded with remedy to be determined later.
After further material was provided to the tribunal, Employment Judge Ian McFatridge issued this further Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £9,958 by way of compensatory award in respect of the unfair dismissal claim, stated as £383 x 26.
The tribunal did not make a basic award because the claimant had already been awarded a redundancy payment of £5,566.26. No interest or separate additional heads of loss are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment following no response. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had already been awarded a redundancy payment of £5,566.26, so no basic award was made; the sum awarded here was a compensatory award of £9,958, calculated as £383 x 26. | Upheld | — | £9,958 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,958
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £9,958
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.