Case 4101898/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101898/2017 Mr V Lakshminarayanan v BP Exploration Operating Company Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 4101898/2017
- Decision date
- 28 August 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101898/2017 Mr V Lakshminarayanan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr V Lakshminarayanan brought complaints of age discrimination and race discrimination against BP Exploration Operating Company Limited. The judgment records that both complaints had been withdrawn by the claimant.
The Employment Tribunal therefore dismissed the complaints under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive findings on liability are recorded in the extracted judgment, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment records that the age discrimination complaint had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the 2013 Rules. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the race discrimination complaint had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the 2013 Rules. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.