Case 4101936/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Bell v Kenneth Martin Photography Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101936/2023
- Decision date
- 2 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sangster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Bell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs H Bell succeeded in four claims against Kenneth Martin Photography Limited. The tribunal found that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £8,756.06 on termination of employment and that this sum had not been paid. It also found that she was entitled to 12 weeks' notice but received none, so she was wrongfully dismissed, with damages assessed at £3,686.76 gross.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages in relation to commission earned in the period 25 November to 31 December 2022, and ordered payment of £501.00 gross. It also found a breach of contract in failing to reimburse expenses incurred between 1 August and 31 December 2022, awarding £93.50 as damages.
The judgment records that the respondent was permitted to deduct income tax and employee national insurance contributions, if required by law, from the sums awarded at paragraphs 2 and 3 before payment of the balance to the claimant. No separate findings on discrimination or other statutory claims appear in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment on termination of employment and that she had not received it. | Upheld | — | £8,756 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to 12 weeks' notice but received none, so she was wrongfully dismissed. | Upheld | — | £3,687 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded in respect of unpaid commission earned for the period 25 November to 31 December 2022. | Upheld | — | £501 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded for expenses incurred between 1 August and 31 December 2022 that were not reimbursed. | Upheld | — | £94 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,037
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.