Case 4101937/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Palethorpe v Trossachs Pie & Pastry Company Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101937/2023
- Decision date
- 13 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Palethorpe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Palethorpe started work for Trossachs Pie & Pastry Company Ltd on 5 December 2022 as a bakery production operative on £11 an hour. The written contract provided for normal hours of 7am to 5pm Monday to Friday, a holiday year from 1 April to 31 March, and clause 4.4 dealing with employees leaving without notice. On 17 January 2023 a dispute arose when Mr Stewart asked him to paint a bakery floor; the claimant said he raised concerns about PPE, paint and clothing and was told, three times, that if he did not do the paint work there was no more work for him.
The tribunal preferred the claimant's account and found that Mr Stewart's words were words of dismissal. It held that Mr Palethorpe was dismissed on 17 January 2023 and without notice, so the breach of contract claim for notice pay succeeded. The tribunal awarded £495, being one week's wages, for that claim.
On wages, the tribunal accepted the claimant's notebook records of his start and finish times and found that he worked 222.25 hours in total. On that basis he was entitled to £2,444.75 gross, had been paid £1,830.40 gross, and had suffered a £614.35 gross unlawful deduction from wages. It also held that clause 4.4 did not authorise a deduction from wages because it did not expressly and unambiguously permit one.
On holiday pay, the tribunal was not persuaded that the four business-closure days on 26 and 27 December 2022 and 2 and 3 January 2023 were holidays, because the contract did not designate them as such and there was no clear notice. It found that the claimant had taken no paid holidays during employment and awarded pay in lieu for 3.5 days, calculated under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations at £346.50 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim. The tribunal found that Mr Palethorpe was dismissed on 17 January 2023 without notice and awarded one week's wages. | Upheld | — | £495 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted the claimant's notebook records of hours worked, found 222.25 hours in total, and held that the £495 final-pay deduction was unauthorised. | Upheld | — | £614 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the business-closure days were not designated holidays and awarded pay in lieu for 3.5 days of untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £347 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,456
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.13(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998 regs 13, 13A, 14 and 15A(3)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.