Case 4101941/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Jenna De Swarte v Fife Housekeeping Ltd t/a Bright & Beautiful — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101941/2023
- Decision date
- 28 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Young
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Jenna De Swarte
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs De Swarte worked for Fife Housekeeping Ltd t/a Bright & Beautiful as a housekeeper from 30 May 2022 until 23 December 2022. She gave notice on 25 November 2022 to expire on 23 December 2022. In the final days of that notice period she texted that she was unwell and would not be in work on 20 and 21 December 2022, and she did not return before the notice period ended. Her final payslip included a deduction of £190 described as PILON.
The tribunal held that the deduction was not authorised by the contractual clause on termination without notice. It found that the clause was directed to an employee who simply failed to work the notice period, and that it did not apply to genuine sickness absence. The tribunal also held that, even if the clause could apply, the respondent had not shown that the £190 represented an actual additional cost of covering the claimant's duties: the calculation in the respondent's document was treated as a shortfall in notice, and the evidence about overtime and a cancelled contract did not establish a net additional cost. The unlawful deduction from wages claim therefore succeeded and £190 was awarded.
On holiday pay, the tribunal applied regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and the contractual holiday provisions. It calculated the claimant's holiday entitlement by reference to her period of service and the holiday already paid, then accepted the respondent's final calculation that £3.99 remained due for accrued but untaken holiday at termination. The total award was £193.99, with no tax or national insurance due on the amounts awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The final payslip deducted £190 labelled as PILON. The tribunal held the contractual notice clause did not authorise the deduction where the claimant was absent because of genuine illness during the notice period, and in any event the respondent had not shown the sum represented an additional cost of covering her duties. | Upheld | — | £190 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found £3.99 remained due for accrued but untaken holiday on termination. It accepted the respondent's holiday pay calculation under the contractual accrual terms and awarded that balance. | Upheld | — | £4 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £194
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Arnold v Britton
- officious bystander test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.