Case 4101942/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Williams v Miller Plastering Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4101942/2020
- Decision date
- 12 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Susan Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent presented no response, and the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21. The tribunal made five findings in the claimant's favour: unauthorised deduction from wages, redundancy payment, breach of contract for failure to give notice or payment in lieu, accrued but untaken holiday pay, and unfair dismissal.
The tribunal ordered payment of £660 for the wages deduction claim, £3,412.50 for redundancy pay, £2,640 as damages for breach of contract, £880 for holiday pay, and £350 as compensation for unfair dismissal. The unfair dismissal award was stated to be compensatory award only. The hearing listed for 10 July 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £660. | Upheld | — | £660 |
| Redundancy | The claimant was found entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,412.50. | Upheld | — | £3,413 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for failure to give notice or payment in lieu, assessed at £2,640. | Upheld | — | £2,640 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to accrued but untaken holiday pay of £880. | Upheld | — | £880 |
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant was found unfairly dismissed and awarded £350 as compensatory award only. | Upheld | — | £350 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,943
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £350
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.