Case 4101949/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A McIntosh v Marchmont Homes Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4101949/2020
- Decision date
- 12 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Susan Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A McIntosh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Susan Walker, issued on the available material because no response had been presented. The tribunal found that Ms A McIntosh had been unfairly dismissed by Marchmont Homes Limited. It ordered payment of £31,257, stated to comprise a basic award of £1,782 and a compensatory award of £21,263, with the compensatory element said to include £20,592 for loss of earnings, £171 for loss of pension and £500 for loss of statutory rights.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and awarded £6,336 in respect of that claim. It further awarded £792 for accrued but untaken annual leave and £1,084 as damages for breach of contract in respect of notice pay. The judgment is dated 2 May 2020 and was entered in the register on 12 May 2020.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment on the papers. The judgment states £31,257 by way of compensation, with a basic award of £1,782 and a compensatory award of £21,263; those figures do not arithmetically reconcile in the extracted text, so the amount is recorded as written. | Upheld | — | £31,257 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £6,336 |
| Holiday pay | Award for accrued but untaken annual leave. | Upheld | — | £792 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded in respect of notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,084 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £31,257
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,782
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £21,263
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.