Case 4101959/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4101959/2015 Mr B Meehan v McKay Flooring Limited (in liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 4101959/2015
- Decision date
- 10 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4101959/2015 Mr B Meehan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr B Meehan's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman issued the judgment on 10 December 2021.
The reasons recorded that correspondence sent to the address provided by the claimant had been returned marked "gone away" and that no new address had been supplied. The claimant's previous agents had withdrawn from acting and did not hold any other address for him beyond the one in the claim form.
In those circumstances, the tribunal concluded that the claim did not appear to be actively pursued and therefore ordered it struck out. The judgment records no determination of the substantive merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text does not restate the substantive claim; the case listing identifies the matter as Unlawful Deduction from Wages. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.