Case 4101960/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4101960/2015 Mr M Davidson v McKay Flooring Limited (in liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 4101960/2015
- Decision date
- 10 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4101960/2015 Mr M Davidson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland struck out Mr M Davidson’s claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment states that the claim had not been actively pursued, so the tribunal did not determine the substance of the underlying case.
In the reasons, Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman recorded that correspondence sent to the claimant at the address provided had been returned marked “gone away”, that no new address had been supplied, and that the claimant’s previous agents had withdrawn from acting. The agents did not hold any other address for him apart from the one given on the claim form.
On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claim did not appear to be actively pursued and therefore ordered that it be struck out. The judgment contains no remedy award because no substantive claim was decided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not state the underlying substantive claim type. The claim was struck out under rule 37 because it was not actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.