Case 4101962/2020 · Employment Tribunal
X v Represented by: X’s Wife Advocate General for Scotland — 2020
- Case reference
- 4101962/2020
- Decision date
- 1 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Young
Parties
2 namedClaimant
X
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal, sitting via Cloud Video Platform on 9 November 2020 before Employment Judge J Young, determined only that it had jurisdiction to hear the claim. The judgment states that the matter should be continued to a full hearing on the merits on dates to be agreed with the parties.
No substantive merits findings are recorded in the extracted text. The reasons for the judgment were removed under paragraph 2 of Schedule 2 to the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 in the interests of national security, so the judgment does not set out the factual or legal basis for the jurisdiction decision.
No compensation, declaration, or other monetary remedy is recorded in the judgment. The case was therefore left to proceed to a later merits hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only a jurisdictional decision: the Employment Tribunal held that it has jurisdiction to hear the claim and that it should be continued to a full hearing on the merits. No substantive liability findings or remedy were decided in the extracted text. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.