Case 4101979/2020 · Employment Tribunal
ETZ 4(WR) IN THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL (SCOTLAND) AT EDINBURGH Order and Judgment of the Tribunal in Case No: 4101979/2020 (A) Issued Following Closed Preliminary Hearing and converted Final Hearing Held at Edinburgh on st July 2020, by Telephone Conference, at pm Employment Judge J G d’Inverno Miss J Burgess v The Dug House Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4101979/2020
- Decision date
- 14 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joseph
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ETZ 4(WR) IN THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL (SCOTLAND) AT EDINBURGH Order and Judgment of the Tribunal in Case No: 4101979/2020 (A) Issued Following Closed Preliminary Hearing and converted Final Hearing Held at Edinburgh on st July 2020, by Telephone Conference, at pm Employment Judge J G d’Inverno Miss J Burgess
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant sought recovery of £1,112.35 said to be outstanding as accrued holiday pay at the effective date of termination, 16 January 2020. The respondent company had ceased trading and was represented by its director, Ms Josalin Greig. The tribunal recorded that the parties agreed the respondent was due and resting owing the claimant the sum claimed as compensation for accrued but untaken paid annual leave entitlement.
The tribunal held that the claim was a statutory claim under the Working Time (Annual Leave) Regulations, not a contractual claim. It rejected the position implicit in the respondent’s ET3 that any matters advanced would found a damages claim for breach of contract in the Employment Tribunal, stating that such a counterclaim would need to be pursued in the Sheriff Court. The tribunal found that no relevant defence to the claim had been advanced and noted the director’s express concession that the sum was due and owing.
By consent, and being satisfied it was just, equitable and proportionate to do so, the tribunal converted the closed preliminary hearing to a final hearing under Rule 64 and entered judgment for the claimant in the agreed sum of £1,112.35. It also directed that an additional copy of the judgment and the enforcement information booklet be sent to the respondent’s director at her home address.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal treated the claim as a statutory claim for accrued but untaken paid annual leave under the Working Time (Annual Leave) Regulations. The respondent’s grounds of resistance were not accepted as a defence to the claim. | Upheld | — | £1,112 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,112
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.