Case 4101983/2020 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101983/2020 Mr A Morrison v People With A Mission Ministries — 2020
- Case reference
- 4101983/2020
- Decision date
- 23 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alexander Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101983/2020 Mr A Morrison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Morrison brought a claim against People With A Mission Ministries in the Employment Tribunal for Scotland. The extracted judgment does not set out the substantive allegations or any merits findings. It records only the disposition of the case.
The tribunal stated that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive determination on liability was made in the extracted text.
No remedy, award, or liability analysis is recorded in the extracted judgment text. The judgment is dated 23 June 2020 and was issued by Employment Judge Alexander Kemp.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive cause of action. It records only that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.