Case 4101990/2020 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone) Miss Nicole Lavery v Supreme Recruitment Agency Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4101990/2020
- Decision date
- 17 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beyzade Beyzade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(sitting alone) Miss Nicole Lavery
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Nicole Lavery worked for Supreme Recruitment Agency Ltd as a Catering Assistant from 23 April 2019 until 15 February 2020. She was paid £8.21 per hour, had no statement of terms, and no holiday records were produced. The tribunal identified a single issue: whether she was owed payment in lieu of untaken holiday on termination of employment.
The tribunal found that, in the absence of a contract, the Working Time Regulations 1998 applied to her annual leave entitlement. It accepted the claimant’s evidence that she had not been paid for any annual leave by the end of her employment, and it used the best evidence available to determine her working pattern: around 40 hours per week until the end of September 2019, then 16 hours per week from 1 October 2019 to 4 December 2019, and 20 hours per week from 5 December 2019 to 15 February 2020, with the two-week Christmas period excluded.
On that basis, the tribunal calculated that the claimant had accrued 146.582908 hours of holiday and was entitled to holiday pay of £1203.45. It then deducted the £340.72 payment on account that she had received after employment ended, leaving £862.73 due. The tribunal held that she had not consented to the deduction from wages and therefore found an unlawful deduction of wages in that amount.
The respondent did not attend the final hearing. The tribunal was satisfied that notice of the hearing had been given and that it was appropriate to proceed in the respondent’s absence. The final order was that the respondent pay the claimant £862.73, subject to any required deductions for tax and national insurance being intimated in writing and remitted to HMRC.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint brought in respect of holiday pay under s.13 ERA 1996; tribunal found the respondent had made an unlawful deduction of wages and ordered payment of £862.73, subject to any required tax and national insurance deductions being intimated in writing and remitted to HMRC. | Upheld | — | £863 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £863
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.27 ERA 1996
- s.230 ERA 1996
- Regulations 13 and 13A Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.