Case 4102001/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102001/2017 Held in Glasgow on and March 2018 Employment Judge: M s M Robison JO t) Mr Graham Rocks v British Telecommunications plc — 2018
- Case reference
- 4102001/2017
- Decision date
- 27 March 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Muriel Robison
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102001/2017 Held in Glasgow on and March 2018 Employment Judge: M s M Robison JO t) Mr Graham Rocks
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was dismissed summarily from his role as a customer services engineer after the respondent investigated allegations that he had registered companies connected with telecommunications services, failed to declare a potential conflict of interest, and made derogatory comments about Openreach online. The claimant accepted that he had registered as a director of Rockscom and created a website, but disputed the seriousness of the allegations and denied knowledge of some online material.
The tribunal found that the respondent had shown conduct as the reason for dismissal. It accepted that the respondent had reasonable grounds for believing misconduct had occurred, including documentary material from BT Security and the claimant's admissions about Rockscom. The tribunal preferred the respondent's evidence where there was conflict and did not accept the claimant's explanations that he lacked knowledge of the LinkedIn and yell.com material.
The tribunal found that the investigation and procedure fell within the band of reasonable responses. It considered the claimant's arguments about his mental health, absence from work, the form of correspondence, delay, and the appeal process, but concluded that further steps were not required in the particular circumstances. It held that dismissal for gross misconduct was within the range of reasonable responses, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant claimed unfair dismissal after summary dismissal for gross misconduct. The tribunal found the dismissal was fair and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.98(1)
- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.98(2)
- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.98(4)
- British Home Stores Ltd v Burchell
- Burchell test
- band of reasonable responses
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
- Sainsbury v Hitt
- Boys and Girls v McDonald
- Crabtree v Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Trust
- Panama v London Borough of Hackney
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.