Case 4102021/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102021/2015 Mr W McKinnon v Creagh Concrete Products Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102021/2015
- Decision date
- 6 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102021/2015 Mr W McKinnon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 6 July 2022, Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman struck out Mr W McKinnon’s claim against Creagh Concrete Products Limited under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
The tribunal recorded that on 21 June 2022 it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 5 July 2022, or to request a hearing so that the tribunal could consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why a strike-out order should not be made and did not request a hearing.
No substantive findings on the merits of any underlying claim are recorded in the extracted text, and no monetary award is made. The judgment is therefore a procedural strike-out decision only.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying cause(s) of action; it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.