Case 4102035/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102035/2015 Mr C Paterson v Angus Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 4102035/2015
- Decision date
- 8 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102035/2015 Mr C Paterson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr C Paterson's claim against Angus Council under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. On 25 September 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant until 9 October 2024 either to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.
The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying wage or working time issues, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued; it does not distinguish this pleaded category separately. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued; it does not distinguish this pleaded category separately. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.