Case 4102090/2017 · Employment Tribunal
L Doherty Mrs E Richards v Bourtreehill Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 4102090/2017
- Decision date
- 13 December 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
Parties
2 namedClaimant
L Doherty Mrs E Richards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material by Employment Judge Laura Doherty. The tribunal found that Mrs E Richards had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered Bourtreehill Limited to pay damages of £1,728.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £144. In addition, it ordered the respondent to pay a redundancy payment of £2,880. The judgment records no other substantive findings or separate heads of remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment on the available material; the tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages. | Upheld | — | £1,728 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £144. | Upheld | — | £144 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a redundancy payment of £2,880. | Upheld | — | £2,880 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,752
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.