Case 4102110/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Gao v Mr W Zhou Represented by Mr Gao Ms X Feng Represented by Mr Gao Mrs F Stefan Represented by Mr Gao Mr Yu Wang — 2025
- Case reference
- 4102110/2025
- Decision date
- 28 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard joined unlawful deduction from wages claims brought by former workers of Uniview Restaurant. The claimants said they should have been paid furlough pay between March 2020 and June 2021. The respondent was the sole director of Uniview Limited, which was said to have been dissolved on 22 June 2021. The claimants had contacted ACAS on 17 May 2021 and obtained a certificate on 18 May 2021, but they did not present tribunal claims at that stage and later tried, unsuccessfully, to pursue an Initial Writ in the Sheriff Court in March 2022.
The tribunal held that the claims were presented well outside the three-month limit in section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It accepted that the pandemic affected access to advice, but found that internet access remained available, that the claimants had already contacted ACAS in May 2021, and that there was no good explanation for the long delay before the tribunal claims were lodged on 9 July 2025. The tribunal was not satisfied that it had not been reasonably practicable to present the claims in time, and in any event found that waiting almost four years after the expiry of the statutory period was not a reasonable period for bringing the claims.
The tribunal also noted that the claimants accepted they were employed by Uniview Limited rather than by the respondent personally. On that basis, and because no allegation was made that the respondent was their employer at the material time, the tribunal said the claims against the respondent had no prospect of success. It therefore held that it had no jurisdiction to determine the unlawful deduction from wages claims and dismissed them.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Joined judgment covering case numbers 4102110/2025, 4102111/2025, 4102212/2025 and 4102114/2025. The tribunal dismissed the unlawful deduction from wages claims for lack of jurisdiction, finding they were out of time under s.23 ERA 1996 and that the claims against this respondent had no prospect of success because the claimants were employed by Uniview Limited, not the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.23(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
- reasonable period thereafter
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.