Case 4102112/2013 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 108786/2007 & others (see schedule below) Mrs S Clark & others v Represented by: Thompsons Solicitor Fife Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102112/2013
- Decision date
- 14 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 108786/2007 & others (see schedule below) Mrs S Clark & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland recorded that the claims brought by Mrs S Clark and others against Fife Council had been withdrawn by the claimants. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The schedule attached to the judgment identifies Julie Ashmall's claim at 4102112/2013 within a group of multiple claims. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Ian McFatridge on 14 October 2019 and sent to the parties the same day. No remedy or monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The extracted judgment records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52. The underlying equal pay classification is taken from the case metadata, as the judgment text itself does not describe the substantive claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.